"Some of the disturbing personal attacks on Ray's mother are crossing the line. Who is monitoring this? Come on, what's the purpose of posting this kind of low class garbage?" Taiwan1997
Thank you for your concern. I am the one who has been monitoring the comments, and have deleted the bad ones. Those I have been letting through were pretty tame.
However, the nasty folks were a minority compared to all the kind and thoughtful words of most. Thank you.
I haven't been posting lately--not just because of my mother's death (by the way, I do have assurance of her salvation), but because God has placed something incredible into our hands.
It is very powerful and will no doubt become huge.
I'm not at liberty to share this with you at present, but will in the near future. I'm blown away by His incredible kindness.
Thanks for your patience. I may post again in a few days.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Monday, May 30, 2011
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Saturday, May 28, 2011
Friday, May 27, 2011
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Sir Isaac Newton was Right. Atheism is senseless.
"Prove that the world is a creation. If you can prove that, then you must also prove that it is your God who created it. Run along now." Bill
The Bible doesn’t mince words. It calls the atheist a "fool" (see Psalm 14:1) and speaks of "his foolish heart" being "darkened." It says that certain godless man are "proud, knowing nothing," and that they are "obsessed with disputes and arguments over words, from which come envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, useless wranglings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth..." (1 Timothy 6:4-5).
How can any person have meaningful dialog with someone who is unreasonable and refuses to call creation what it is--a creation? But the root of the corrupt tree isn’t atheism—-it's pride (see Psalm 10:4). I am encouraged that some, who profess to be atheists, write to me outside of this blog, and some even show up at the ministry for lunch or just to chat.
These types of people are open-minded, show a measure of humility, and they are the very reason this blog exists.
Please, soften your heart and think about the issues of life and death. You only get one chance at life. Don't blow it.
The Bible doesn’t mince words. It calls the atheist a "fool" (see Psalm 14:1) and speaks of "his foolish heart" being "darkened." It says that certain godless man are "proud, knowing nothing," and that they are "obsessed with disputes and arguments over words, from which come envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, useless wranglings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth..." (1 Timothy 6:4-5).
How can any person have meaningful dialog with someone who is unreasonable and refuses to call creation what it is--a creation? But the root of the corrupt tree isn’t atheism—-it's pride (see Psalm 10:4). I am encouraged that some, who profess to be atheists, write to me outside of this blog, and some even show up at the ministry for lunch or just to chat.
These types of people are open-minded, show a measure of humility, and they are the very reason this blog exists.
Please, soften your heart and think about the issues of life and death. You only get one chance at life. Don't blow it.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Monday, May 23, 2011
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Atheists Cashing in on the Rapture
Regarding the stupidity of predicting the rapture, Richard Dawkins said,
"An aspect of religion that intrigues me is its capacity to con money out of a seemingly endless supply of gullible idiots. Is there anything so stupid that, if you put it out there, you can't find thousands of people (and their money) to believe it."
And those who believe what the professor says can buy his books, DVD's, trinkets, T-shirts, etc., from his website. There is an endless supply who do.
Pic. Atheist earrings, just $22.
"An aspect of religion that intrigues me is its capacity to con money out of a seemingly endless supply of gullible idiots. Is there anything so stupid that, if you put it out there, you can't find thousands of people (and their money) to believe it."
And those who believe what the professor says can buy his books, DVD's, trinkets, T-shirts, etc., from his website. There is an endless supply who do.
Pic. Atheist earrings, just $22.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
The Atheist's Ultimate Mistake
Rugby is a great game. It's like American football, except there are no pads, it's faster, and the ball can't be tossed forward.
Our son records games for us so that we can enjoy watching them, and the cool thing is that he only gives us games in which our team doesn't lose. It's a win/win situation. So we never panic when the other team gets ahead. Not in the slightest.
Such is the case with Christianity. We can’t lose. I never panic for a second when an atheist thinks he’s ahead of the game by saying that God doesn't exist, that things evolved, or that the Bible is full of mistakes.
God exists. Nature (creation) proves that. Knowing Him proves it. The reality of the conscience prove's it. Having the gift of everlasting life proves it. Then on top of all that I have foreknowledge of Scripture. God has recorded the game from the beginning to the end.
Every sign of the age in which we live is perfectly lined up--from increased godlessness, increased knowledge, fear of the future, the trouble in the Middle East, earthquakes in different parts of the world, hypocrisy in the Church, and much more—perfectly pinpointed in Scripture. Then there's the verses that tell us that skeptics will predictably say that these signs have always been around…and they have, but the trouble around Israel gives us the timeline.
The only mistakes in the Bible are mistakes people have made, and atheists are making the ultimate mistake when they reject God's mercy. When they think that they will ultimately win, they delude themselves. But this isn't some game. Its outcome will determine where they will spend eternity.
Our son records games for us so that we can enjoy watching them, and the cool thing is that he only gives us games in which our team doesn't lose. It's a win/win situation. So we never panic when the other team gets ahead. Not in the slightest.
Such is the case with Christianity. We can’t lose. I never panic for a second when an atheist thinks he’s ahead of the game by saying that God doesn't exist, that things evolved, or that the Bible is full of mistakes.
God exists. Nature (creation) proves that. Knowing Him proves it. The reality of the conscience prove's it. Having the gift of everlasting life proves it. Then on top of all that I have foreknowledge of Scripture. God has recorded the game from the beginning to the end.
Every sign of the age in which we live is perfectly lined up--from increased godlessness, increased knowledge, fear of the future, the trouble in the Middle East, earthquakes in different parts of the world, hypocrisy in the Church, and much more—perfectly pinpointed in Scripture. Then there's the verses that tell us that skeptics will predictably say that these signs have always been around…and they have, but the trouble around Israel gives us the timeline.
The only mistakes in the Bible are mistakes people have made, and atheists are making the ultimate mistake when they reject God's mercy. When they think that they will ultimately win, they delude themselves. But this isn't some game. Its outcome will determine where they will spend eternity.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
I Found a Thinking Atheist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJQFVqnlZTw&feature=player_embedded
He is right. These people will owe us an apology...then again, if they are right, I will gladly apologize to them. The Bible says "But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only" (Matthew 24:36).
We don't know the Day or the hour, but we can certainly know the "signs of the times." See Matthew 24, Luke 21, 2 Timothy 3 and many other passages. And keep your eyes on Israel. He is coming:
"...when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe, because our testimony among you was believed" (2 Thessalonians 1:7-10)
He is right. These people will owe us an apology...then again, if they are right, I will gladly apologize to them. The Bible says "But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only" (Matthew 24:36).
We don't know the Day or the hour, but we can certainly know the "signs of the times." See Matthew 24, Luke 21, 2 Timothy 3 and many other passages. And keep your eyes on Israel. He is coming:
"...when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe, because our testimony among you was believed" (2 Thessalonians 1:7-10)
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Stephen Hawking's Senseless Atheism
To say anything negative about Stephen Hawking is like bullying a blind man. He has an unfair disadvantage, and that gives him the benefit of his own bully-pulpit.
Peter Sellers once played a very simple gardener, who was mistakenly thought to be extremely intelligent--it was because of that fine dividing line between genius and insanity
Such is the case with Professor Hawking. He is heralded as "the genius of Britain," and yet some of his beliefs border on the insane, or at least they are very weird.
He believes the scientific impossibly that nothing created everything (Sir Isaac Newton called atheism "senseless and odious"), that there are space aliens, and that if we (us six billion plus human beings) don't start living in space, we will become extinct within a century.
Not only does he have this insight way back into our origins, into deep space, but he also has a unique knowledge of the afterlife.
He knows that Heaven doesn't exist.
John Lennon wasn't so sure. He said to pretend there's no Heaven. That's easy if you try. Then he said he hoped that someday we would join him. No doubt when he wrote those words, he wasn't thinking about where he would be, someday.
Notes:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/sep/02/stephen-hawking-big-bang-creator
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/space/article7107207
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7935505/Stephen-Hawking-mankind-must-move-to-outer-space-within-a-century.html
Peter Sellers once played a very simple gardener, who was mistakenly thought to be extremely intelligent--it was because of that fine dividing line between genius and insanity
Such is the case with Professor Hawking. He is heralded as "the genius of Britain," and yet some of his beliefs border on the insane, or at least they are very weird.
He believes the scientific impossibly that nothing created everything (Sir Isaac Newton called atheism "senseless and odious"), that there are space aliens, and that if we (us six billion plus human beings) don't start living in space, we will become extinct within a century.
Not only does he have this insight way back into our origins, into deep space, but he also has a unique knowledge of the afterlife.
He knows that Heaven doesn't exist.
John Lennon wasn't so sure. He said to pretend there's no Heaven. That's easy if you try. Then he said he hoped that someday we would join him. No doubt when he wrote those words, he wasn't thinking about where he would be, someday.
Notes:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/sep/02/stephen-hawking-big-bang-creator
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/space/article7107207
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7935505/Stephen-Hawking-mankind-must-move-to-outer-space-within-a-century.html
Monday, May 16, 2011
What Can an Atheist Know?
"You're being dishonest. You don't know hell is real, you believe hell is real." Zathras Have you heard of Tadmor Prison? Do you know if it exists or where it is located? If you don't know anything about it, should you therefore say that someone who maintains it is real, is dishonest? Of course not.
In the natural world, we can't really "know" anything. There was a time when men "knew" that the earth was flat, or that there was nine planets or that the earth was millions of years old. Now they know that it's billions of years old, and they will think they know that until someone who knows better will convince them that they don't know.
We think we know that the sky is blue, but it's not, or that we know the direction of up and down, when we don't. Up is down, down-under. We don't even know if this life is nothing but a dream from which we will awake to reality.
So in a natural world, we can only "know" something to a certain extent-—where we are as convinced as can be. But when God wants us to know something, we aren't talking about a natural realm. The equation changes. In the supernatural realm, nothing is impossible and God always has His way.
Even before I came to know God, I didn't doubt His existence for a moment. The amazing order of natural life--from the atom to the universe--told me that there was a super-natural-Maker. It is a scientific impossibility for nature to make itself, because nature would have had to have existed before it made itself.
I also intuitively knew that this supernatural Maker required moral accountability. But it wasn't until I was confronted with God's Law (the Ten Commandments) that I realized the degree of accountability-—that He considered lust to be adultery and hatred to be murder.
The moment I acknowledged my sins, the cross made sense to me—-I had violated God's Law, but Jesus paid my fine. That meant that God could legally dismiss my case and allow me to live. My death sentence was commuted by the mercy of God.
When I obeyed the gospel, repenting of my sins and trusting alone in Jesus Christ, I was made a new person overnight. It wasn't as though I had simply had a change of mind. It was a complete change of person. Ray Comfort BC died, and Ray Comfort AD came to life.
That was nearly 40 years ago, and I'm still shaking my head at the radical nature of the new birth. I suddenly loved God when I hadn't given Him a serious thought in my 22 years of secular life. I was brand new, had a peace I couldn't understand, and a joy that I couldn't express.
When I opened the Bible, its words came alive and I began to read specific details in this 2,000 year old book of what had happened to me. It explained why I felt brand new, why I had a "peace that passes all understanding" and a "joy unspeakable." It explained everything I had experienced when I "called upon the name of the Lord."
If I purchased a complex appliance that came with an instruction book that told me to follow 27 directions, one after the other, at the end of which the appliance worked, I could then "know" that the book was the correct instruction book. Any other conclusion would be irrational.
The Bible proved itself to be the Maker's Instruction Book that made the appliance work. It proved itself by explaining the supernatural experience of conversion, and it also warns of Hell...hundreds of times.
But there's an even greater reason we can "know" that Hell is real. We know that a fool denies that God exists (see Psalm 14:1), but there is something just as foolish. There are some who acknowledge God's existence but say that He doesn't care about right or wrong-—that He has no concern for righteousness, justice and truth.
To believe such is to be guilty of violation of the First and the Second of the Ten Commandments. It is to make up a false image of God, one that says that God couldn't care less that Hitler slaughtered millions of innocents—-that He is like a corrupt judge that turns a blind eye to injustice.
Such a belief couldn't be further from the truth. The Bible calls Him "the habitation of Justice," warning that He will "bring every work to judgment including every secret thing, whether it is good or evil."
The Bible tells us that we can supernaturally "know” certain things—"You will know that you have passed from death to life," "You will know the truth and the truth will make you free," "I know and believe and am persuaded..."
The knowledge that a converted person has is far more than an intellectual belief and even more than subjective experiential knowledge.
If you have the word of a Supreme Court judge, you have a high authority—-you can pretty much rely on his or her word. If you have the word of a King, you have a high authority that you could certainly depend upon. But in the Bible we have the Word of God, above which there is no higher authority and therefore you can "know" that what it says is absolute truth. And the Word of God warns that there will be a Day of retribution, and that Hell is the just reward of the wicked.
So it would be disingenuous of me to say that I "believe" that Hell is real. I "know" it is, and will therefore spend the rest of my life "warning every man" as the Bible tells me to.
In the natural world, we can't really "know" anything. There was a time when men "knew" that the earth was flat, or that there was nine planets or that the earth was millions of years old. Now they know that it's billions of years old, and they will think they know that until someone who knows better will convince them that they don't know.
We think we know that the sky is blue, but it's not, or that we know the direction of up and down, when we don't. Up is down, down-under. We don't even know if this life is nothing but a dream from which we will awake to reality.
So in a natural world, we can only "know" something to a certain extent-—where we are as convinced as can be. But when God wants us to know something, we aren't talking about a natural realm. The equation changes. In the supernatural realm, nothing is impossible and God always has His way.
Even before I came to know God, I didn't doubt His existence for a moment. The amazing order of natural life--from the atom to the universe--told me that there was a super-natural-Maker. It is a scientific impossibility for nature to make itself, because nature would have had to have existed before it made itself.
I also intuitively knew that this supernatural Maker required moral accountability. But it wasn't until I was confronted with God's Law (the Ten Commandments) that I realized the degree of accountability-—that He considered lust to be adultery and hatred to be murder.
The moment I acknowledged my sins, the cross made sense to me—-I had violated God's Law, but Jesus paid my fine. That meant that God could legally dismiss my case and allow me to live. My death sentence was commuted by the mercy of God.
When I obeyed the gospel, repenting of my sins and trusting alone in Jesus Christ, I was made a new person overnight. It wasn't as though I had simply had a change of mind. It was a complete change of person. Ray Comfort BC died, and Ray Comfort AD came to life.
That was nearly 40 years ago, and I'm still shaking my head at the radical nature of the new birth. I suddenly loved God when I hadn't given Him a serious thought in my 22 years of secular life. I was brand new, had a peace I couldn't understand, and a joy that I couldn't express.
When I opened the Bible, its words came alive and I began to read specific details in this 2,000 year old book of what had happened to me. It explained why I felt brand new, why I had a "peace that passes all understanding" and a "joy unspeakable." It explained everything I had experienced when I "called upon the name of the Lord."
If I purchased a complex appliance that came with an instruction book that told me to follow 27 directions, one after the other, at the end of which the appliance worked, I could then "know" that the book was the correct instruction book. Any other conclusion would be irrational.
The Bible proved itself to be the Maker's Instruction Book that made the appliance work. It proved itself by explaining the supernatural experience of conversion, and it also warns of Hell...hundreds of times.
But there's an even greater reason we can "know" that Hell is real. We know that a fool denies that God exists (see Psalm 14:1), but there is something just as foolish. There are some who acknowledge God's existence but say that He doesn't care about right or wrong-—that He has no concern for righteousness, justice and truth.
To believe such is to be guilty of violation of the First and the Second of the Ten Commandments. It is to make up a false image of God, one that says that God couldn't care less that Hitler slaughtered millions of innocents—-that He is like a corrupt judge that turns a blind eye to injustice.
Such a belief couldn't be further from the truth. The Bible calls Him "the habitation of Justice," warning that He will "bring every work to judgment including every secret thing, whether it is good or evil."
The Bible tells us that we can supernaturally "know” certain things—"You will know that you have passed from death to life," "You will know the truth and the truth will make you free," "I know and believe and am persuaded..."
The knowledge that a converted person has is far more than an intellectual belief and even more than subjective experiential knowledge.
If you have the word of a Supreme Court judge, you have a high authority—-you can pretty much rely on his or her word. If you have the word of a King, you have a high authority that you could certainly depend upon. But in the Bible we have the Word of God, above which there is no higher authority and therefore you can "know" that what it says is absolute truth. And the Word of God warns that there will be a Day of retribution, and that Hell is the just reward of the wicked.
So it would be disingenuous of me to say that I "believe" that Hell is real. I "know" it is, and will therefore spend the rest of my life "warning every man" as the Bible tells me to.
Friday, May 13, 2011
Just a tool...
There are many situations in which the archive can actively distort reality. Even massively fictitious thinking can motivate behaviors that are active in the real world. At best our vaunted attempt at "meta" is just one tool in a toolkit that is frequently used in favor of other tools. Once this kind of reasoning is removed from its pedestal as the only way to think, a host of alternatives become available.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Monday, May 9, 2011
Semantic Digital Archives
**Call for Papers***
Semantic Digital Archives - sustainable long-term curation perspectives of Cultural Heritage
29.09.2011
International Workshop on "Semantic Digital Archives - sustainable long-term curation perspectives of Cultural Heritage" to be held as part of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL).
Objectives:
The Semantic Digital Archives Workshop aims at promoting and discussing sophisticated knowledge representation and knowledge management solutions specifically designed for improving Archival Information Systems.
Over the past couple of decades, digitally created content has come to permeate all aspects of our lives and the life cycle of these objects is increasingly exclusively digital. Therefore, sustainable long-term curation perspectives for our digital cultural heritage are essential. Digital content poses many socio-cultural and technological challenges which create obstacles to long-term or indefinite preservation. Changing technologies and shifting user communities as well as the increasing complexity of digital content being enriched with software and multimedia attachments are only a few examples. Dealing with these challenges is the central theme of the workshop. This full day workshop is an exciting opportunity for collaboration and cross-fertilization between the Digital Libraries, the Digital Archives and the Semantic Web community. It specifically encourages closer dialogue between the technical oriented communities and researchers from the (digital) humanities and social sciences as well as cultural heritage institutions.
Topics of Interest:
We intend to have an open discussion on topics related to the general subject of Semantic Digital Archives. The following list of topics is meant as an initial guide. Hence, we welcome contributions that focus on, but are not limited to:
· ontologies and linked data for digital archives and digital libraries, e.g. semantic extensions of common knowledge models of the digital archiving and digital libraries domain, e.g. METS, EAD, Premis, ...
· ontologies and (semantic) web services implementing the OAIS standard
· theoretical and practical archiving frameworks extending or replacing the OAIS standard
· logical theories for digital archives
· implementations and evaluations of digital archives
· semantic or logical provenance models for digital archives or digital libraries
· information integration/semantic ingest (e.g. from digital libraries)
· trust for ingest and data security/integrity check for long-term storage of archival records
· semantic search and semantic information retrieval in digital archives and digital libraries
· visualization and exploration of digital content (stored or to be stored in a digital archive)
· semantic extensions of emulation/virtualization methodologies tailored for digital archives
· migration strategies based on semantic (web) technologies
· semantic long-term storage and hardware organization tailored for AIS
· (empirical) studies evaluating end-user needs and its evolution as well as information
· seeking behaviour of end-user needs and its evolution
· knowledge evolution
Submission Details:
Authors are invited to submit original, unpublished research papers related to the aforementioned topics.
We invite:
· regular papers (10 to 12 pages)
· short papers (4 to 6 pages)
All submissions are required to be in pdf format. All submissions should be anonymous (i.e., no author names/affiliations and obvious citations). Long and short paper submissions should be in the Springer's LNCS format.
Submissions are to be made via the submission web site:https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=sda2011
Submissions will be reviewed by the three members of the Program Committee. All papers accepted at the Semantic Digital Archives Workshop must be presented during the Workshop by a TPDL 2011 and SDA Workshop registered participant. All papers will be published in workshop proceedings, which will be available as a separate publication after the Workshop
Important Dates
Deadline for Submissions: 30 June 2011
Acceptance Notification: 30. July 2011
Camera-ready Papers: 20. August 2011
Organizing Committee & Program Committee
The Organizing Committee members and a preliminary list of Program Committee members can be found at http://sda2011.dke-research.de/index.php/committees
Further Details
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Call for Papers
Journal of Screenwriting
Call for Papers - 3. 2
We invite researchers, educators and practitioners to contribute to Issue 3.2 of the Journal of Screenwriting, a newly established peer-reviewed journal which focuses on this important aspect of moving image pre-production and conceptualisation. Contributions are sought on the history, theory and practice of screenwriting and related topics, covering a wide range of practices from film and television to animation, new media and computer games.
The Journal of Screenwriting brings together research and reflection on pedagogy, professionalism and practice in an area which has been somewhat overlooked in academic discourse. New work has conventionally been scattered throughout journals devoted to specific aspects of media theory or practice, and this is the first academic journal to bring together serious screenwriting-related work under one title. The Journal is international in scope, and seeks wide-ranging work which is critical, rigorous and original in its contribution to this developing area of study. We expect to include work which employs a diverse range of methodological approaches, including textual analysis, production analysis, practice as research and historical investigation.
Topics may include (but are not limited to):
• Screenplay text analysis
• Studies of individual practitioners, including screenwriters
• Story and narrative analysis
• Methodologies and theories appropriate for research and study in this field
• Industrial structures, institutions and practices in relation to screenwriting
• Gender and race issues
• Genre studies
• Comparative study between nations or regions, cultures and industries
• Creativity and screen idea development
• Conventions, norms and craft
• Screen-reading and the reception of the screen idea
• The history of screenwriting
• Cognitivism, psychology and psychoanalysis in relation to screenwriting
• National and international contexts
We also welcome articles suggesting new approaches to the study of screenwriting and new approaches to the teaching of screenwriting.
Articles should be between 4000 and 8000 words in length.
Articles, to include a 200 word abstract, should be sent by Monday 19th September 2011 to the Principal Editor, Jill Nelmes (j.nelmes@uel.ac.uk), and to the Co-Editor, Jule Selbo (jselbo@fullerton.edu). Please contact either Jill or Jule regarding any queries about suitability of subject or other requirements.
-
We invite researchers, educators and practitioners to contribute to Issue 3.2 of the Journal of Screenwriting, a newly established peer-reviewed journal which focuses on this important aspect of moving image pre-production and conceptualisation. Contributions are sought on the history, theory and practice of screenwriting and related topics, covering a wide range of practices from film and television to animation, new media and computer games.
The Journal of Screenwriting brings together research and reflection on pedagogy, professionalism and practice in an area which has been somewhat overlooked in academic discourse. New work has conventionally been scattered throughout journals devoted to specific aspects of media theory or practice, and this is the first academic journal to bring together serious screenwriting-related work under one title. The Journal is international in scope, and seeks wide-ranging work which is critical, rigorous and original in its contribution to this developing area of study. We expect to include work which employs a diverse range of methodological approaches, including textual analysis, production analysis, practice as research and historical investigation.
Topics may include (but are not limited to):
• Screenplay text analysis
• Studies of individual practitioners, including screenwriters
• Story and narrative analysis
• Methodologies and theories appropriate for research and study in this field
• Industrial structures, institutions and practices in relation to screenwriting
• Gender and race issues
• Genre studies
• Comparative study between nations or regions, cultures and industries
• Creativity and screen idea development
• Conventions, norms and craft
• Screen-reading and the reception of the screen idea
• The history of screenwriting
• Cognitivism, psychology and psychoanalysis in relation to screenwriting
• National and international contexts
We also welcome articles suggesting new approaches to the study of screenwriting and new approaches to the teaching of screenwriting.
Articles should be between 4000 and 8000 words in length.
Articles, to include a 200 word abstract, should be sent by Monday 19th September 2011 to the Principal Editor, Jill Nelmes (j.nelmes@uel.ac.uk), and to the Co-Editor, Jule Selbo (jselbo@fullerton.edu). Please contact either Jill or Jule regarding any queries about suitability of subject or other requirements.
-
Thursday, May 5, 2011
From Israel
I'm Manuel Brambila, Ray's Personal Assistant. We are in Israel filming Season Five of "The Way of the Master" television program.
Ray won't be blogging until next week because filming is so time consuming.
Best wishes to all of you,
Manuel
Ray won't be blogging until next week because filming is so time consuming.
Best wishes to all of you,
Manuel
Monday, May 2, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(1825)
-
▼
May
(31)
- Thanks for Your Thoughts
- Man, constantly constructs and reconstructs the c...
- Ready for work.
- Most media is today too often lays open the chance...
- The power of Imagination is that it can imagine po...
- If it is transparent - it's hard to see.
- 1000000603
- 1000000604
- Gliese 581d seems nice this time of year.
- I have learned there are faces that in no way can ...
- I have learned there are faces that in no way can ...
- The ability to reason that emotion is the base of ...
- My Mother died last night. I will be taking a few ...
- Sir Isaac Newton was Right. Atheism is senseless.
- Attacked by a Parrot
- 1000000584
- "I secretly think reality exists so we can specula...
- Atheists Cashing in on the Rapture
- The Atheist's Ultimate Mistake
- I Found a Thinking Atheist
- Stephen Hawking's Senseless Atheism
- What Can an Atheist Know?
- Just a tool...
- The experience of organizational life is mostly o...
- Semantic Digital Archives
- 1000000528
- 1000000529
- 1000000530
- Call for Papers
- From Israel
- 1000000464
-
▼
May
(31)







