"Primate worshiper, I need your advice. When Ray says that atheists are 'fools,' is that raw hate? When he quotes (out of context, but that's another matter) Psalm 14:1 in defense of his position, does that prove that the Psalms are a reservoir of raw hate?" Steven J.
I don't hate anybody. It is clear to me that if someone believes that nothing created everything he or she is a fool (see the sidebar of this blog to see the list of the many atheists and scientists who believe that).
To believe that there was no First Cause is not only unscientific; it's unreasonable. To believe that nothing could create anything, let alone everything is absolute foolishness. And that's the position of the professing atheist.
I know that you define "nothing" as "There's nothing to eat in the fridge." By "nothing," you mean that there is something there, but you find it distasteful. Agreed.
Let's see if Psalm 14:1 is quoted in context:
"The fool has said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that does good. The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that does good, no, not one" (Psalm 14: 1-3).
The Word of God says the atheist is a fool. I agree wholeheartedly. There's no "raw hate." It's simply raw common sense.
In another comment, you (Steven J.) said "Ray frequently cites Psalm 14:1 as 'proof' that atheists are fools; occasionally he feigns erudition and calls us 'morons.'"
I don't cite the verse as proof that atheists are fools. It's not something that needs proving. It's self-evident.
Also, I am not aware of ever calling atheists "morons" on this blog or anywhere else--even once, let alone "occasionally". I would therefore be grateful if you could cite evidence of me doing this. If you do, I will sincerely apologize. If not, I think you owe me an apology. Thank you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(1825)
-
▼
July
(40)
- Atheists, Voltaire, Morality and God
- "We are all responsible for everyone else - but I ...
- Once you introduce the idea of function you introd...
- 509
- It is not the strongest of the species that surviv...
- The preliminary signal of resistance has become th...
- The unknown quality of the archive that draws toge...
- Hamlet: Why then 'tis none to you; for there is no...
- If we believed that we must try to find out what is...
- What living and buried speech is always vibrating ...
- Information theory is not sufficient. It doesn’t in...
- One must retrace an experimental protocol of thoug...
- The illiterate of the future will be ignorant of t...
- Independent Curators International (ICI) is now ac...
- Just made a "to be eliminated" circle on G+.
- No reciprocity, no friendship and yes I will encou...
- A Friendly Visit From an Atheist
- The need for cultural diversity and ethical genero...
- How many types of nothing are there?
- The best content delivery system is a human.
- As the body; links thinking to the sense experienc...
- Have not all railings and bridges fallen into the ...
- In the company of the academy. I can only think. "...
- How one feels in the company of the german the aca...
- If there is no logical contradiction of difference...
- The event is only affirmed when [one] is aware of t...
- To think something out language must be crippled, ...
- The Atheist Experience
- The archive certain of itself, clear in its consti...
- Recently the body been misplaced as an impediment ...
- A disturbed and disturbing relationship to time—hi...
- Nothin' to see here move along.
- Nothin' to see here move along.
- Nothin' to see here move along.
- Caution: Objects in this post may be closer than t...
- Sorel speaks that humans ‘do nothing great without...
- Be nice to friends, without them you would be a st...
- Bestimmen von etwas als etwas!
- The Definition of an Atheist
- Way to go Dan!
-
▼
July
(40)


No comments:
Post a Comment